Legal Opinion

State v. Chambers

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 17, 1893PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from Linn District Gowrt. — Hon. J. H. Pbeston, Judge. The defendant was indicted, tried and convicted of the crime of incest with his step-daughter, Sarah D. Cowden. Judgment was entered against him on the verdict, from which judgment he appeals. The correctness of the appellee’s amended and additional abstract being denied, and no transcript filed, the case must be considered upon the appellant’s abstract alone.

1Opinion of the CourtGtven, J.

i cbiminal law: ienge grand1’ 3ury-I. The appellant was charged with the crime of incest, before a justice of the peace, and on April 6, 1891, he waived examination, and gave bond to appear and answer before the grand jury. The district court being then in session, the grand jury returned an indictment on April 11, 1891, against the defendant, charging him with the same act of incest. The appellant moved to quash the indictment for the reason that no opportunity was given him to challenge the grand jury, and because the grand jury had no right to take jurisdiction of the case. It does not…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bassett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. State v. DonovanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
  3. State v. SloanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
  4. State v. HughesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
  5. People v. QuanstromMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. United States v. HicksonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  2. People v. StrattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. State v. HurdSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  4. Wilkinson v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  5. Signs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API