Legal Opinion

United States v. King

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided March 6, 2017No. Case No. CR-13-0063-FPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: FORFEITURE

STEPHEN P. FRIOT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Table of Contents

I. Introduction... 881

A. The Criminal Charges.. .882

B. The Trials and Convictions... 883

C. The Moving Papers and Evidentiary Hearing.. .884

II. Authority for Forfeiture... 886

A. Forfeiture Procedures... 886

B. General Principles.. .887

C. Forfeitures Based on RICO Conspiracy Convictions... 891

D. Forfeitures Based on Convictions for Operation of Illegal Gambling Business ...894

E. Forfeitures Based on Money Laundering Conspiracy Convictions... 895

F. Forfeiture Based on a Facilitation Theory..…

2Cases cited72 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. United States v. BajakajianSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. One 1958 Plymouth Sedan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. NeffDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. United States v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  3. United States v. $115,413.00 In US CurrencyDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2025
  4. United States v. YoungDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API