Legal Opinion

United States v. Young

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 13, 2018No. Criminal No. 2017-0083Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) v. ) Criminal No. 17-cr-083 (KBJ) ) KEITH J. YOUNG, ) ) Defendant. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION As a legal doctrine, criminal forfeiture under section 853 of Title 21 of the United States Code has evolved considerably over the past few decades; indeed, the doctrinal underpinnings of many forfeiture practices have yet to be fully developed. The government has proposed one such fledgling theory of criminal forfeiture in the instant case: based on Defendant Keith Young’s conviction at trial of one count of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Clark v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Alexander v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States v. MonsantoSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Libretti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Honeycutt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2017

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API