Pineo v. Heffelfinger
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Meeker county, Brown, J., presiding, refusing to dissolve an injunction.
1Opinion of the CourtBeRky, J.
This action is brought for the purpose of cancelling a mortgage and preventing its foreclosure. Proceedings to foreclose by advertisement having been instituted, a temporary injunction was issued, restraining the sale. Defendant’s motion to dissolve having been denied, he appeals.
Was the refusal to dissolve error? At the time of the execution of the mortgage the mortgaged, premises were, and ever *184since have been, the homestead of the plaintiff’s husband, (Dan Pineo,) and in the occupation of him and his family. The mortgage was in fact executed by the plaintiff and her husband, but the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- De Godey v. GodeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Babcock v. SanbornSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1859
- Poor v. CarletonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1837
3Cited by5 opinions
- Village of Blaine v. Independent School District No. 12Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Stees v. KranzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Knoblauch v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Schmidt v. GouldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Huron Waterworks Co. v. City of HuronSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1893