Stees v. Kranz
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Bamsey county, Brill, J., presiding, refusing to dissolve a temporary writ of injunction, issued upon complaint, which was verified by the oath of two of the plaintiffs, each saying “that he knows the contents of the foregoing and attached complaint, and that the said complaint is true.” The motion to dissolve was made upon-a similarly verified answer, and was opposed by a verified reply and by affidavit.
1Opinion of the CourtGilfillan, C. J.
June 14, 1883, plaintiffs executed to Hugo and Isaac Kahn a lease of certain premises in St. Paul for the term of five years. The lease contained a provision that if the lessee should fail to fulfil any of the covenants contained in it, the lessors might “re-enter and take full and absolute possession of the above-rented described premises, and hold and enjoy the same fully and absolutely, without such re-entering working a forfeiture of the rents to be paid and the covenants to be performed by the said parties of the.second part, their heirs, executors, administrators, or assigns, for the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Pineo v. HeffelfingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
3Cited by19 opinions
- Galbraith v. WoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Page v. Fees-Krey, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1980
- Village of Blaine v. Independent School District No. 12Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Green v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
- Independent School District No. 35 v. EngelstadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.