Legal Opinion

Security-First National Bank v. J. G. Ruddle Properties, Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1931No. Docket No. Sac. 4479PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

This is a motion by the respondent, upon suggestion of diminution of record, to have inserted in and made a part of the clerk’s transcript an order amending the judgment appealed from.

Plaintiff brought the action to foreclose a mortgage given by the appellant J. G. Ruddle Properties, Inc., to secure a bond issue. Several junior encumbrancers were also named as defendants, some of whom answered, but none of whom asked that his lien be foreclosed. In fact, separate actions for the foreclosure of their respective liens had been filed by a few of the junior lienholders. At the commencement of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Biaggi v. RamontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Aspegren Co., Inc. v. Sherman, Swan Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Dutton Dredge Co. v. GossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kohlstedt v. HauseurCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  2. Kohlstedt v. HauseurCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. Morgan v. NeffAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API