Legal Opinion

O'Neal v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided September 25, 1991No. 05-90-00732-CRPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STEWART, Justice.

A trial court found appellant, James Hoyt O’Neal, guilty of the misdemeanor offense of driving while intoxicated (DWI) and assessed punishment at ninety days' confinement, probated for two years, and a $500 fine. In two points of error, appellant contends that the evidence is insufficient to sustain his conviction for DWI and to prove that he did not have normal use of his mental and physical faculties by reason of the introduction of alcohol into his body. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Appellant was involved in a three-car collision. Dallas Police Officer…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Englander Co. v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Beck v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. Rowlett v. Colortek, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
  4. Tapiador v. North American Lloyds, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1989
  5. Greenwood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Greenwood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  2. O'Neal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  3. Skinner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  4. DeGay v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996
  5. Dustin Dumont v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API