Skinner v. State

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

BAIRD, Judge.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of delivery of a controlled substance. The *634trial judge assessed punishment at twenty years confinement. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Skinner v. State, 799 S.W.2d 402 (Tex.App. — El Paso 1990). We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review. We will affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals.

I

A recitation of the pertinent facts is necessary to address appellant’s questions for review. Appellant’s two count indictment alleged the offense of delivery of a controlled substance by…