Tapiador v. North American Lloyds
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Per curiam
The Tapiador appellants ask this Court to reduce the appeal bond set by the trial court. They claim the bond of $7500 is excessive. In response, appellee asserts that a complete statement of facts is required for the Court to properly review the Tapiador appellants’ points of error.
The Tapiador appellants attempted to limit their appeal pursuant to rule 40(a)(4), Tex.R.App.P. They requested that the court reporter prepare a partial statement of facts and included a statement of the points on which they would rely, 1 as re quired by rule 53(d), Tex.R.App.P. Appellant Chapa, third party…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rowlett v. Colortek, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
- Smith v. Texas Improvement Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Galvin v. Gulf Oil Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
- Mouton v. Cassello, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1985
- Shaw v. Greater Houston Transportation Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1989
3Cited by14 opinions
- Cox & Smith Inc. v. Cook, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
- Cannon v. ICO Tubular Services, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
- Greenwood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Click v. TyraCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Gardner v. Baker & Botts, L.L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.