Legal Opinion

Allstate Insurance Co. v. Hirose

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1994No. 15745PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOON, Chief Justice. **

Appellant Allstate Insurance Company (Allstate) filed a complaint for declaratory relief under federal diversity jurisdiction in the United States District Court for the District of Hawai'i (USDC). Allstate sought a declaration of its rights and responsibilities under its insurance policy, issued to James Hirose, concerning the combining of two or more coverage limits of underinsured motorist (UIM) benefits under a single policy [hereinafter, intra-policy stacking]. 1

Following motions for summary judgment, the USDC certified to this court the question whether the laws…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Franks v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Sturla, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceHawaii Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Methven-Abreu v. Hawaiian Insurance & Guaranty Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Walton v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceHawaii Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Allstate Insurance v. MorganHawaii Supreme Court · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Sabia v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  2. State v. KalamaHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Iddings v. Mee-LeeHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Dines v. Pacific Ins. Co., Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Mikelson v. United Services Automobile Ass'nHawaii Supreme Court · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API