Legal Opinion

Laborer's Pension Fund v. Lay-Com, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided September 2, 2009No. 06-3711, 06-3821 & 07-1071PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.

The Laborers’ Pension funds won a default judgment against M.A. King Construction, Inc. and King & Larsen Construction, Inc., as well as against Mike King, a director and officer of both companies. Those defendants were judgment proof, so the funds added new defendants in an amended complaint. The district court found some of the new defendants, Lay-Com, Inc., Lord & Essex, Inc. and the Lay Trust — but not John Popp Jr., an individual — liable on a veil-piercing theory, and granted summary judgment to the funds and to Popp Jr. We affirm the decision to pierce M.A. King’s…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Judson Atkinson Candies, Inc. v. Latini-Hohberger DhimantecCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  2. Freeland v. Enodis Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  3. Sea-Land Services, Inc. v. The Pepper Source, Caribe Crown, Inc., Gerald Marchese Doing Business as Jamar CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  4. Fontana v. TLD Builders, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  5. Hystro Products, Inc. v. Mnp CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. William Bridge v. New Holland Logansport, IncorpCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  2. Wachovia Securities, LLC v. Banco Panamericano, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  3. Gastineau v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  4. Deschepper v. Midwest Wine & Spirits, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
  5. Jackman Financial Corp. v. Humana InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API