Tidwell v. Chiricahua Cattle Co.
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL ffom a judgment of the District Court of the Second Judicial District in and for the County of Graham. Owen T. Bouse, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtDoan, J.
This is an action in ejectment that was brought by the appellee, as plaintiff, in the district court of Graham County, Arizona, for the possession of certain premises designated in the complaint as the “Cottonwood Eanch,” a tract of unsurveyed public land, containing less than one hundred and sixty acres, and the improvements thereon. The complaint alleges appellee to be a corporation; “that it was en*359titled to the possession of said premises; that a large portion of the land is under fence, has been cultivated, and is capable of producing profitable crops from irrigation; that plaintiff has…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- National Bank v. MatthewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- National Bank v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Atherton v. FowlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Wright v. MattisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
- Manuel v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pacific Livestock Co. v. GentryOregon Supreme Court · 1900
- Duvall v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Collier v. BartlettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Third National Exchange Bank v. SmithNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1912
- Third National Exchange Bank v. SmithNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.