Legal Opinion

Collier v. Bartlett

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 3, 1918No. 9163PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from District Court, Creek County; Ernest B. Hughes, Judge. Action by H. U. Bartlett against W. J. Collier and others. Judgment for plaintiff, ami defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtRainey, J.

H. U. Bartlett, as plaintiff, filed in the district court of Creek county. Okla., his verified petition against th^ defendants W. J. Collier, W. S. McCray, B. B. Burnett, B. C. Burnett, and Moss Petroleum Company, a Corporation alleging in substance that the plaintiff was the owner of and in possession of 200 acr^s of land in sections 26 and 35, township 19 north, range 7 east; that some time in January, 1917, the defendants, by fraud, without right, and without notice to the plaintiff, went upon said land, cut and removed timber therefrom destroyed fences, and undertook, through their agents…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Fort Dearborn Lodge No. 214 v. KleinIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Goodson v. BrothersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  3. Williams v. . BuchananSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1841
  4. Lofstad v. MuraskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Staton v. . MullisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lewis v. SchaferSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  2. McGrath v. EichoffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  3. Cobb v. WhitneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Deskins v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  5. Cox v. KelleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API