Legal Opinion
City of Cincinnati v. Jenkins
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided September 21, 2001No. Appeal Nos. C-000732, C-000733, C-000734, Trial Nos. 99CRB-45427A, 99CRB-45427B, 99CRB-48260PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Doan, Presiding Judge.
Defendant-appellant Shawn Jenkins was charged with operating a sexually-oriented business in the city of Cincinnati without a sexually-oriented-business license, in violation of Cincinnati Municipal Code 899-5(A), and with two counts of being an employee of a sexually-oriented business without a license, in violation of Cincinnati Municipal Code 899-5(B), all misdemeanors of the first degree. After pleading not guilty, Jenkins filed a motion to dismiss all charges, which the trial court denied. Jenkins then filed a “motion for reconsideration” of his motion to dismiss…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Freedman v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Nightclubs, Inc.,plaintiff-Appellant v. City of PaducahCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- M. J. Kelley Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. DeanOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. SpanoOhio Court of Appeals · 2011