Legal Opinion

State v. Spano

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 18, 2011No. 10 MA 3Published

1Opinion of the Court

Waite, Presiding Judge.

{¶ 1} Appellant, Armando Spano, pleaded guilty to, and was convicted of, one count of violating Canfield Township’s zoning ordinances, and he was fined $25 for failure to obtain a special-event zoning permit. Appellant operates a car dealership in Canfield, and the violations arose from signs he put up advertising a sale at the dealership. Canfield’s zoning regulations require a person to obtain a permit before setting up a special-event advertising device. Appellant contends that the zoning regulation is unconstitutional because it engages in prior restraint and gives…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. United States v. BroceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Hill v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API