Legal Opinion

Strong v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 13, 2025No. 24-1537Published

1Opinion of the Court

In the United States Court of Federal Claims NATHAN STRONG, Plaintiff, v. No. 24-1537 Filed November 13, 2025 THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. Nathan Strong, Alexandria, Virginia, plaintiff, pro se. Blake W. Cowman, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for defendant. OPINION AND ORDER Granting the government’s motion to dismiss Nathan Strong, proceeding without an attorney, seeks damages for an alleged breach of a settlement agreement with the U.S. Office of Special Counsel from when he was employed in that office. The government moves to dismiss Mr. Strong’s…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. United States v. FaustoSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API