Legal Opinion

State Highway Board v. Jamac Corporation

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 2, 1973No. 84-72PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarney, J.

The potential allocation of damages from highway condemnation brought a boundary dispute into focus. Thereupon the highway board brought this equitable declaratory judgment action to determine the precise extent of its obligation to compensate each landowner. The lower court, in response to the petition, went ahead to hear evidence and make findings, and determined the boundaries on all sides of the disputed piece, even , though the highway taking did not dislocate every bound.

The piece of land involved is a small parcel conveyed from the midst of a larger holding that entirely surrounds it.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Leno v. MeunierSupreme Court of Vermont · 1965
  2. deNEERGAARD v. DillinghamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1963
  3. Parrow v. ProulxSupreme Court of Vermont · 1940
  4. Price v. RowellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1960
  5. LANE CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gardner v. Town of LudlowSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977
  2. Dessureau v. Maurice Memorials, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1974
  3. Fairbrother v. AdamsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977
  4. Withington v. DerrickSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  5. Albertine v. Churchview Estates, LLCVermont Superior Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API