Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. v. Bissell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1922No. Docket No. 20PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1DissentFellows, C. J.

Defendant was an employer of labor operating under the workmen’s compensation law. Plaintiff, an .Illinois corporation authorized to do business in this State, was his insurer. One William Lemerand was in the employ of defendant. He claimed that on the 3d of July, 1918, he received an accidental, personal injury in such employment; on November 21st he served a written claim for compensation on defendant who promptly notified plaintiff of such claim. The usual proceedings followed. The defense principally relied upon was that the employer did not have notice of the accident until he received…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Rudd v. . CornellNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. Natoma Water & Mining Co. v. ClarkinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Estate of Beckwith v. SpoonerMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Warren v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  5. Oakland Motor Co. v. American Fidelity Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Besonen v. CampbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  2. De Campos v. State Compensation Insurance FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Ayers v. GenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Hopkins v. City of MidlandMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Hines v. Continental Baking CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API