Legal Opinion

Burgett v. Womer

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1937No. 26654. Department OnePublished

1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.

This is an action to foreclose labor liens on a shingle mill owned by defendant Womer, and upon certain shingles which had been manufactured at the mill. Plaintiffs also sought to hold defendant Twin Harbors Lumber Company in damages for eloignment of certain shingles which had been removed from the mill. The defendant Womer defaulted, and as to him, judgment was entered in favor of plaintiffs for the amount of the claims and foreclosure of the liens as against the mill and a quantity of shingles which had not been removed from the mill. Judgment of dismissal was entered as to defendant Twin…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Akers v. LordWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Douglass v. Woodbury Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Judge v. Bay Mill Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Carr v. Bunker Creek Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Swartwood v. Red Star Shingle Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API