Jordan v. Reed
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
■OPINION
RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice.
Appellants, residents of the Eagle River-Chugiak Borough, were unsuccessful plaintiffs in a class action brought in the superior court seeking declaratory and in-junctive relief against the Anchorage Charter Commission. The superior court expeditiously processed the case and granted summary judgment in favor of appellees “dismissing the complaint, denying injunc-tive relief, and declaring the Anchorage Charter Commission, as presently constituted, a valid public body authorized to proceed with its statutory functions under AS 29.68.240 et seq.” We affirm. 1
The…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kramer v. Union Free School District No. 15Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- City of Phoenix v. KolodziejskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Ravin v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- Gilbert v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Lynden Transport, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Surina v. BuckalewAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Kott v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
- City of North Pole v. ZabekAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- Kerttula v. AboodAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. MichelCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.