Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Aberdeen Claims Administration, Inc. v. Satyam Computer Services Ltd.

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided April 1, 2010No. MDL 2027PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TRANSFER ORDER

JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman.

Before the entire Panel * : Plaintiff in an action pending in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania has moved, pursuant to Rule 7.4, R.P.J.P.M.L., 199 F.R.D. 425, 435-36 (2001), to vacate our order conditionally transferring the action (Aberdeen) to the Southern District of New York for inclusion in MDL No.2027. Responding defendants Satyam Computer Services Ltd.; PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited; Price Waterhouse, Lovelock & Lewes; and PricewaterhouseCoopers Private Limited oppose the motion.

After considering all argument of counsel, we…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Chiquita Brands International, Inc., Alien Tort Statute & Shareholders Derivative LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2008
  2. In Re Satyam Computer Services, Ltd., Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2009

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In re Convergent Telephone Consumer Protection Act LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2013
  2. Baker v. Wright Medical Technology IncDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2020
  3. Baker v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2020
  4. Craugh v. Wright Medical Technology IncDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2020
  5. Craugh, Gary v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2020

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API