Legal Opinion

Baker v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 19, 2020No. 2:20-cv-00823Unknown

1Opinion

WwAOwe 2.4 UV VVUL □□ INVIVIT INGEN PYVLULITIOCTIt 2 PHM Vora payt +tviv FILED. EASTERN DISTRICT ARKANS UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL AUG 1 4 2020 on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION JAMES WeACCORMACK, CL FILED IN RE: PROFEMUR HIP IMPLANT Aug 19. 2020 PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION CLERK, rsyaier court MDL No. 2949 TRANSFER ORDER Before the Panel: Plaintiffs in the Eastern District of Arkansas Simpson action and the Western District of Wisconsin Chadderdon action move under

28 U.S.C. § 1407

to centralize pretrial proceedings in the Eastern District of Arkansas. These cases concern alleged defects in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re Xarelto (Rivaroxaban) Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2014
  2. Aberdeen Claims Administration, Inc. v. Satyam Computer Services Ltd.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2010
  3. In re Mirena IUD Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API