Taylor v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTINGLY, Judge.
Demetrius Taylor appeals the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. We consolidate and restate his issues as:
1. Whether improper references at trial to Taylor’s post-arrest silence constituted reversible error; and
2. Whether Taylor was subjected to double jeopardy when he was convicted of both rape and confinement.1
We reverse and remand.
FACTS
On December 18, 1989, the victim left her apartment door slightly open when she went to the front of her apartment building to meet a neighbor who was to take the victim’s daughter to school. When the victim returned to…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Wethington v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- Webster v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
- Henson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
- Cossel v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Taylor v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Angle v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
- Angle v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
- Collier v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Collier v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999