Legal Opinion
Cossel v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided December 30, 1996No. 62A01-9603-PC-74PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NAJAM, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Timothy L. Cossel appeals from the post-conviction court’s denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. Cossel was tried by jury and convicted as charged of five felonies: Rape, as a Class A felony; Criminal Confinement, as a class B felony; Criminal Deviate Conduct, as a Class A felony; Battery, as a Class C felony; and Burglary, as a Class B felony. His convictions were affirmed on direct appeal. Cossel subsequently filed his petition for post-conviction relief, which was denied.
We affirm.
ISSUES
Cossel presents several issues for our review…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Saffle v. ParksSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Sawyer v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Badelle v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Timothy Cossel v. Charles MillerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Collier v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Kellett v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Cuto v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.