Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Angle v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 11, 1998No. 12A04-9711-CR-495Published

1ConcurrenceSullivan, Judge

As to Issue I, I concur but would advance a somewhat different or expanded rationale for affirming the refusal of the instruction on the Class B misdemeanor battery as an included offense of rape.

As tendered, Angle’s instruction was confined to simple battery as a Class B misdemeanor. In this regard it would have been misleading to the jury in implying that the jury must find him guilty of rape, or of a Class B misdemeanor battery, or acquit. Under the facts of this case, it would have been possible for the jury to find Angle not guilty of rape but guilty of a battery of a higher degree than…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ector v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Walton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Webster v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Staton v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Taylor v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API