Legal Opinion

United States v. Ray E. Oliver, A/K/A Edward Ray Oliver

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 7, 1981No. 80-5437PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEITH, Circuit Judge.

Appellant Edward Ray Oliver was indicated and charged with manufacturing marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a) and 18 Ü.S.C. § 2. At a pre-trial suppression hearing, the district court sustained a motion by Oliver to exclude evidence obtained from the warrantless search of his property. The evidence the government had sought to admit was marijuana crops which were discovered growing in a field on the property. On this appeal, the United States argues that a warrantless search of open farm land is not a violation of the Fourth Amendment search and seizure provision…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Hester v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. United States v. Lawrence David RamapuramCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. HenselCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
  3. United States v. Ray E. Oliver, A/K/A Edward Ray OliverCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  4. Dow Chemical Co. v. US, by and Through GorsuchDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1982
  5. United States v. GerenaDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API