Legal Opinion

Rutledge v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 15, 1883PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Shelby Circuit Court. — Hon. John T. Eedd, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Philips, C.

This is an action for damages for killing cattle by the defendant railroad, based on what is known as the 43rd section. Wag. Stat., art. 2, ch. 37. There were three counts in the petition. It is not necessary to set them out as they are good in form. The answer is a general denial.

On the trial, plaintiffs introduced testimony tending to prove that during the years 1878, 1879 and 1880, plaintiffs were partners and were still such, and were the owners of the stock described in their petition; that all of the stock sued for by plaintiffs in this cause were killed and crippled by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clardy v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1881
  2. Walton v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Rwy. Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  3. Case v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1882
  4. Robinson v. Chicago & Alton R. R.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  5. Tredway v. S. C. & St. P. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1876

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. v. ReesmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
  2. Morris v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  3. Rozzelle v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  4. Hurley v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  5. Emmerson v. St. Louis & Hannibal Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1889

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API