Legal Opinion

Rozzelle v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1883PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from Clay Circuit Court. — Hon. George W. Bunn, , Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtHenry, J.

This action was instituted in the circuit court of Clay county to recover double damages of defendant for killing four steers, the property of plaintiff. The petition alleges that the cattle “ came upon the railroad track and were run over and killed at a point on the same where it passes through uninclosed lands, and at a point on said road where there was no public or private crossing,” and where said road was not fenced. Plaintiff had judgment from which this appeal is prosecuted.

1. baxlboad: dam-plaint. The first question relates to the sufficiency of the petition, and it is contended…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rutledge v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. v. ReesmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
  2. Moberly v. Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1885
  3. Russell v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  4. Kinion v. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890
  5. Russell v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API