Legal Opinion

Morris v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1883PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from Buchanan Circuit Court. — IIon. J. P. G-rubb,, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtHough, C. J.

This is a suit under the 43rd section of the Railroad Law, (R. S., § 809,) for damages for stock killed and injured by reason of the failure of defendant to erect and maintain fences as required by law. The petition contains three counts which are substantially the same, except as to dates and the description of the stock killed and injured.

1.railroads: double ; five11^stocm'píeadí ¡ mg: jeofails. The first count is as follows: Plaintiff states that defendant is indebted to him in the sum of $15 for the killing-of one hog, the property of plaintiff, by defendant’s engines and cars, which were…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Edwards v. Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881
  2. Clardy v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1881
  3. Walton v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Rwy. Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  4. Rutledge v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  5. Chubbuck v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Pritchard v. HewittSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
  2. Brink v. Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1885
  3. Kinion v. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Riggs v. St. Francois County Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1906
  5. Edwards v. Missouri Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1900

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API