Legal Opinion

Rainwater v. Hattiesburg Coca-Cola Bottling Co.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1922No. 22776PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

The appellee is a manufacturing company engaged in bottling soft drinks, among which is one called “orange crush.” The appellant’s evidence is to the effect that he purchased a bottle of orange crush, bottled by the appellee from a retail dealer, drank it, and then for the first time discovered that it contained several dead flies and other insects, because of which he was made sick, resulting in damage to him. There was a verdict and judgment for the appellee, defendant in the court below.

At the request of the appellant, the court below requested the jury to find for him in the event he was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mazetti v. Armour & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Davis v. Van Camp Packing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1920
  3. Parks v. C. C. Yost Pie Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  4. Watson v. Augusta Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  5. Catani v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Jacob E. Decker & Sons, Inc. v. CappsTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Coca-Cola Bottling Works v. LyonsMississippi Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Harrist v. Spencer-Harris Tool Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Pelletier v. DupontSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1925
  5. Madouros v. Kansas City Coca Cola Bottling Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1936

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API