Legal Opinion

Harrist v. Spencer-Harris Tool Co.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1962No. 42248PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodgers, J.

This is a products liability suit growing out of an accident, in which Harrell Harrist, an employee of Rowley Drilling Company received an injury alleged to have been caused by the faulty manufacture of an oil rig sold through a dealer to appellant’s employer.

Appellant filed a hill in the Chancery Court of Adams County, Mississippi, against Spencer-Harris Tool Company, a Texas corporation, hereinafter called the “Manufacturer”; The Youngstown Sheet and Tool Company, an Ohio corporation, The Continental Supply Company, a Delaware corporation, subsidiary of the Ohio corporation, and the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Campo v. ScofieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  3. Le Blanc v. Louisiana Coca Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
  4. Kalash v. Los Angeles Ladder Co.California Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Pillars v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1918

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. State Stove Manufacturing Company v. HodgesMississippi Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Mrs. Frances Buckley Ward, Cross-Appellant v. The Hobart Manufacturing Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  3. Brown v. WilliamsMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Stevens v. Durbin-Durco, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  5. Green v. Allendale Planting Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2007

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API