Legal Opinion

Gomes v. Byrne

California Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1959No. Sac. 6919Published

1Opinion of the Court

51 Cal.2d 418 (1959)

ALFRED W. GOMES, Appellant,

v.

SELMA F. E. BYRNE, Respondent.

Sac. No. 6919.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

Jan. 9, 1959.

P. M. Barceloux, Burton J. Goldstein, Goldstein, Barceloux & Goldstein, James William Morgan and Jordan M. Peckham for Appellant.

Albert M. King, Harry Dierup and Dorothy D. McKalson for Respondent.

SPENCE, J.

Plaintiff sought damages under the so-called Dog Bite Statute (Civ. Code, 3342) for injuries inflicted by defendant's dog. Following a trial without a jury, judgment was entered for defendant. Plaintiff appeals from said judgment and from the order…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Prescott v. Ralphs Grocery Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Ching Yee v. Dy FoonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Gomes v. ByrneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Cambou v. MartyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. Sloboden v. Time Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API