Granger v. Robinson
California Supreme Court
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Riverside County and from an order refusing a new trial. J. S. Noyes, Judge. The facts are cited in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
Motion to dismiss an appeal upon the ground that the undertaking is insufficient. The appeal is from the judgment, and also from an order denying a new trial. The undertaking recites both of the appeals, and that in consideration thereof the appellant will pay all damages and costs which may be awarded against him on the appeal, or on the dismissal thereof, not exceeding three hundred dollars.
It was held in Chester v. Bakersfield Town Hall Assn., 64 Cal. 42, that, upon an appeal from both the judgment and an order denying a new trial, only one undertaking for three hundred dollars…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chester v. Bakersfield Town Hall Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Sharon v. SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Corcoran v. DesmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Pacific Paving Co. v. BoltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Bornheimer v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Magee v. WhitacreNevada Supreme Court · 1939
- Blaisdell v. SteinfeldArizona Supreme Court · 1914
- Bell v. StaackeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Dodge v. KimpleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Sucker State Drill Co. v. BrockNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.