Legal Opinion

Hedding v. Schauble

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 4, 1920No. 21,806PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action in ejectment in the district court for Hennepin county, and to recover $500 damages for withholding possession of the property and $1,000 for use and occupation thereof. The answer interposed a counterclaim for $1,000. The case was tried before Bardwell, J., who at the close of the testimony granted plaintiff’s motion for a directed verdict. From, an order denying her motion for a new trial, defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

This is an action in ejectment involving the same property that was involved in the case of Schauble v. Hedding, 138 Minn. 187, 164 N. W. 808. In that action Mrs. Schauble sought to recover possession of the property from Mrs. Hedding, but, before the action was finally determined, Mrs. Hedding’s tenant moved out of the building leaving it vacant, whereupon Mrs. Schauble moved in and is now in possession. The present action followed. The trial court directed a verdict for plaintiff and defendant appeals from an order denying a new trial

■Considerable evidence seems to have been…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ermentrout v. Girard Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  2. Dispatch Printing Co. v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  3. Board of Education v. HughesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  4. Burchard v. HullSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  5. Graves v. HortonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Engelking v. First State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  2. Hill v. JamesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  3. Saunders v. Commercial Credit TrustSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  4. Schoenborn v. State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  5. Citizens State Bank v. Minnesota Sugar Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API