Commonwealth v. Kuszewski
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtNolan, J.
We are asked to decide two issues in this case: (1) whether the Commonwealth has a right of interlocutory appeal to,the full court after a single justice of the court has allowed the defendant’s motion to suppress evidence, and; (2) whether the single justice committed reversible error in allowing the defendant’s motion to suppress. We rule that the Commonwealth has a right of interlocutory appeal to the full court under the circumstances of this case and that *803the single justice was correct in allowing the defendant’s motion to suppress.
1. Right of the Commonwealth to appeal. After the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Commonwealth v. SnowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Gilday v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
- Commonwealth v. DuniganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
3Cited by5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. AllenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Commonwealth v. RinguetteMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
- Commonwealth v. TshudyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1993
- Commonwealth v. RiveraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Commonwealth v. EugeneMassachusetts Superior Court · 1997