Commonwealth v. Tshudy
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
Although there may have been deficiencies in the confidential informant’s basis of knowledge (i.e., the informant’s personal knowledge of the inculpatory facts2), police surveillance and a controlled buy of marihuana suBciently filled gaps so as to establish probable cause for a search warrant. It was error to allow motions to suppress evidence on the ground that the search warrant upon which police acted was inadequately supported.
Complaints for possession of marihuana with intent to distribute it (G. L. c. 94C, § 32C) and possession of a Class C substance (G. L. c. 94C, § 34) provided the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Commonwealth v. UptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Commonwealth v. AllenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Commonwealth v. BenlienMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. VillellaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1995
- Commonwealth v. DesperMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
- Commonwealth v. McAfeeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
- Commonwealth v. RichardsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
- Commonwealth v. DesperMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.