Legal Opinion

Mickey v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. and Corr., Unpublished Decision (1-14-2003)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 14, 2003No. 02AP-539 (REGULAR CALENDAR)Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Sean Mickey, appeals from the April 17, 2002 decision of the Ohio Court of Claims rendering judgment in favor of defendant-appellee, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction ("DRC"), with regard to appellant's claims of wrongful and false imprisonment. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the decision of the Court of Claims.

{¶ 2} In October 1996, appellant was indicted for carrying a concealed weapon, corruption of a minor, gross sexual imposition, kidnapping, aggravated arson, assault of a police officer, and felonious assault with police officer…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Murphy v. City of ReynoldsburgOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Tokles & Son, Inc. v. Midwestern Indemnity Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Koos v. Central Ohio Cellular, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API