Legal Opinion
Griffin v. American Gold Min. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 25, 1903No. 712PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERT, Circuit Judge.
Upon a rehearing of this cause, the court, after a careful consideration of the terms of the contract involved therein, and the circumstances which attended its execution, has reached the conclusion that its construction thereof on the former hearing (Griffin v. American Gold Mining Co., 114 F. 887, 52 C.C.A. 507) was erroneous. The contract was made between M. W. Murry, the grantor of the plaintiff in error, as the party of the first part, and the Silver Bow Basin Mining Company, the predecessor in interest of the defendant in error, as party of the second part. It…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Williams v. Bank of the United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- Griffin v. American Gold Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1902
3Cited by4 opinions
- Griffin v. American Gold Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1905
- First Trust & Savings Bank v. RakliosAppellate Court of Illinois · 1928
- Vulcan Trading Corp. v. Kokomo Steel & Wire Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1920
- Adams-McGill Co. v. HendrixDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1938