Legal Opinion
Griffin v. American Gold Mining Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 27, 1905No. 1,111PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MORROW, Circuit Judge.
This action was commenced by the plaintiff in error in the District Court of the United States for the District of Alaska on November 20, 1893, to recover from the defendant in error the sum of-$25,000, with interest, on a contract for the conveyance of a mining claim. On February 18, 1901, judgment was rendered against the plaintiff in error. On writ of error to this court the judgment was reversed (Griffin v. American Gold Mining Co., 123 F. 283, 59 C.C.A. 301), and the cause was remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of the court. In…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Watt v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Gonzales v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Ross and Morrison v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1816
- Brusie v. GatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Sharp v. BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Larson v. HugillDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1954
- National Piano Manufacturing Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928
- National Piano Mfg. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928
- Trustees for Ohio & Big Sandy Coal Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1927
- Trustees for Ohio & Big Sandy Coal Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1927