Legal Opinion
Boitnott v. Border Foods, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided February 21, 2019No. 0:18-cv-01702Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Jerald Boitnott, Case No. 18-cv-1702 (WMW/ECW) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ v. MOTION TO DISMISS AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO Border Foods, Inc., doing business as Taco AMEND Bell; and RALCO, LLC, Defendants. Before the Court are Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and Plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint. (Dkts. 12, 27.) For the reasons addressed below, Defendants’ motion to dismiss is granted, Plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Already, LLC v. Nike, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.