Legal Opinion
In Defense of Animals v. United States Department of Interior
District Court, E.D. California
Decided August 9, 2010No. 2:10-cv-01852PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., District Judge.
Plaintiffs in this action, which consist of an animal rights group along with a wild horse and burro sanctuary and other concerned individuals, seek though this Motion to halt a planned “gather”, or roundup, of wild horses and burros scheduled to commence on August 9, 2010 at the Twin Peaks Herd Management Area (“HMA”). ■Plaintiffs argue that the planned gather runs counter to the congressional mandate for preserving wild horses and burros as set forth in Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act, 16 U.S.C. § 1331, et seq. (“Act”).…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers, Local No. 70Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Kleppe v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Habitat for Horses v. SalazarDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Western Rangeland Conservation Ass'n v. ZinkeDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2017
- Friends of Animals v. SparksDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2016
- In Defense of Animals v. United States Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2012
- Stout v. U.S. Forest ServiceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.