Legal Opinion

Wallace v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 4, 2018No. 0053/17Published

1Opinion of the CourtMoylan, J.

Precisely when (and why) the Sixth Amendment right to counsel attaches to a person is a far more nuanced inquiry than would at first blush appear likely. This appeal presents us with a profusion of such nuances. The appellant, Davon Wallace, was convicted by a jury, presided over by Judge Lawrence V. Hill, Jr., of second-degree depraved heart murder and two related firearm counts. On this appeal, he contends:

1. The lower court erred by denying the motion to suppress an incriminating statement.

2. The lower court erred by ruling that Mr. Wallace had no meritorious reason for discharging counsel.

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Schad v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Maine v. MoultonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. United States v. GouveiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API