Legal Opinion

North Pacific Insurance v. Hamilton

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 1, 1998No. 95-CV-0461-AB; CA A94301PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*334ARMSTRONG, J.

Defendants Bonnie and Donald Hamilton appeal a grant of summary judgment in favor of plaintiff North Pacific Insurance Co. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

The facts are undisputed. Defendants are a wife and husband who owned a 1992 Mercury automobile. They were insured under a motor vehicle insurance policy issued by North Pacific. The policy had a $60,000 limit on liability coverage for one person in any one accident. It further provided, however, that it did

“not provide Liability Coverage for any person:
"* * * *
“10. For bodily injury or property damage to you or any…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Collins v. Farmers InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Babb v. Mid-Century InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  4. Edwards v. Bonneville Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. North Pacific Insurance v. HamiltonOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Gaucin v. Farmers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  3. Jeld-Wen, Inc. v. Environmental Quality CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. North Pacific Insurance v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API