North Pacific Insurance v. Hamilton
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*334ARMSTRONG, J.
Defendants Bonnie and Donald Hamilton appeal a grant of summary judgment in favor of plaintiff North Pacific Insurance Co. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
The facts are undisputed. Defendants are a wife and husband who owned a 1992 Mercury automobile. They were insured under a motor vehicle insurance policy issued by North Pacific. The policy had a $60,000 limit on liability coverage for one person in any one accident. It further provided, however, that it did
“not provide Liability Coverage for any person:
"* * * *
“10. For bodily injury or property damage to you or any…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Collins v. Farmers InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- Babb v. Mid-Century InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Edwards v. Bonneville Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1985
3Cited by4 opinions
- North Pacific Insurance v. HamiltonOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- Gaucin v. Farmers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Jeld-Wen, Inc. v. Environmental Quality CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- North Pacific Insurance v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998