Egedi v. Egedi
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
YEGAN, Acting P. J.
Parties contemplating dissolution of marriage may choose a “friendly divorce” or they can engage in the emotional and financial turmoil of protracted litigation. Some parties electing a “friendly divorce” will seek the help of a single attorney to assist them in putting their settlement agreement in proper legal form.1 In this situation, there is a problem but not an insurmountable one, i.e., the attorney draftsperson has a potential conflict of interest because he or she cannot simultaneously represent adverse parties. As we shall explain, where a single attorney…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- In Re TahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. CarpenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- In Re Marriage of BondsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Adams v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Calcaterra v. BadakhshCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Sharp v. Next Entertainment Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- In Re Marriage of FriedmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Gargano v. Plus One Holdings, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2023
- Lakeshore Investment LLC v. Now Solutions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2026
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.