Legal Opinion

Egedi v. Egedi

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 28, 2001No. B140733PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

YEGAN, Acting P. J.

Parties contemplating dissolution of marriage may choose a “friendly divorce” or they can engage in the emotional and financial turmoil of protracted litigation. Some parties electing a “friendly divorce” will seek the help of a single attorney to assist them in putting their settlement agreement in proper legal form.1 In this situation, there is a problem but not an insurmountable one, i.e., the attorney draftsperson has a potential conflict of interest because he or she cannot simultaneously represent adverse parties. As we shall explain, where a single attorney…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. In Re TahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. People v. CarpenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. In Re Marriage of BondsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Adams v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Calcaterra v. BadakhshCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. Sharp v. Next Entertainment Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. In Re Marriage of FriedmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. Gargano v. Plus One Holdings, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2023
  5. Lakeshore Investment LLC v. Now Solutions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2026

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API