Legal Opinion
Burnett v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided February 9, 1988No. 87-0219-CV-W-JWOPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOHN W. OLIVER, Senior District Judge.
This case pends on defendants’ motions for summary judgment. 1 Defendants contend that plaintiffs’ cause of action is time barred under the six-month statute of limitations for hybrid Section 301/fair representation litigation adopted in DelCostello v. Teamster’s, 462 U.S. 151, 155, 103 S.Ct. 2281, 2285, 76 L.Ed.2d 476 (1983). 2 Plain tiffs oppose defendants' motions for summary judgment contending that the “evidence supports a finding that genuine issues as to material facts exist regarding the issues of the running of the limitation…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Edward R. POSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SKYLINE CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Patricia Babrocky v. Jewel Food Company and Retail Meatcutters Union, Local 320, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Camfield Tires, Inc. v. Michelin Tire CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
- Ina King v. The New York Telephone Company, Inc., and the Telephone Traffic Union (New York)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Onyiah v. St. Cloud State UniversityDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
- Arif v. AT&T CORP.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1997
- Skyberg v. United Food & Commercial Workers International UnionDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1992
- Wainscot v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1993
- Zawodniak v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1992