Legal Opinion

Arif v. AT&T CORP.

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided February 11, 1997No. LR-C-95-328PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

STEPHEN M. REASONER, Chief Judge.

Pending before the Court is the Motion for Summary Judgment filed on behalf of the defendant, AT&T Corporation. For the reasons stated herein, the Motion is granted. 1

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

On October 19, 1993, AT&T announced that it was relocating all of its repair, returns and refurbishing work from its West Chicago facility to its facility in Little Rock, Arkansas. All plaintiffs in this action are employees who, at the time of their transfer, were employed by AT&T in its West Chicago plant and were covered by a Collective Bargaining Agreement…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Smith v. Evening News Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Garrish v. United Automobile, Aerospace, & Agricultural Implement Workers of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
  2. Pierce v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API