Legal Opinion

Wainscot v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided September 10, 1993No. 92-1024-CV-W-1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

WHIPPLE, District Judge.

Plaintiffs brought this action pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 185 (§ 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act), alleging that their employer, Jack Cooper Transport (hereafter “Employer”) breached a collective bargaining agreement, and that the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (hereafter “Union”) breached its duty of fair representation. Defendants seek summary judgment1 contending that Plaintiffs’ cause of action is barred by the six-month statute of limitations as adopted by the United States Supreme Court in DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Glus v. Brooklyn Eastern District TerminalSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Robert Johnson Grain Company v. Chemical Interchange CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Arif v. AT&T CORP.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API