Legal Opinion

Millington v. Hiedloff

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 20, 1935No. 13,394PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Young

The plaintiff in error, Pauline Millington, was defendant helow and the defendant in error, May Hiedloff, was plaintiff. In this opinion the parties will be so designated.

The defendant and Hattie Millington, her mother, at and prior to the time of the accident, out of which this action grows, resided together in the same house in Denver and constituted a family. The defendant was the owner of a Chevrolet sport roadster, which was used by both members of the family partly for pleasure and partly for business. In October, Mrs. Millington made a trip to Coaldale, near Salida, Colorado, to see…

2Cited by43 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. North Carolina Department of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Pettingell v. MoedeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
  3. Sunward Corp. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  4. Falls v. MortensenOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Blood v. Qwest Services Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2009

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API