Legal Opinion

City of Wichita v. Board of County Commissioners

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 11, 1922No. 23,495PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Sedgwick district court, division No. 1; Thomas E. Elcock, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

The city of Wichita in this action sought to recover from Sedgwick county for certain necessary charges and expenses incurred and paid by the city during an epidemic of smallpox in 1917 and 1918. The city’s itemized and verified bill for reimbursement was presented to the board of county commissioners of Sedgwick county for payment. Payment was refused. Hence this lawsuit.

The trial court gave judgment for the defendant upon the pleadings and certain agreed facts, and the case is here for review.

The pertinent statute reads:

“Whenever smallpox…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. State v. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  3. Dykes v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Pearson v. Probate CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  2. State ex rel. Miller v. Common School District No. 87Supreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  3. Water District No. 1 v. RobbSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  4. State ex rel. Smith v. McCombsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  5. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API