Legal Opinion
McCormack International Corp. v. Vohra
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 21, 1994No. 91 Civ. 3638 (DNE)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
EDELSTEIN, District Judge:
This action was brought by plaintiff McCormack International Corp. pursuant to the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968 (1988). Plaintiffs complaint also includes supplemental state law claims to foreclose a lien, impress a trust, and for conversion. Defendants Satinder Vohra, Sunil Voh-ra, 1 Sunil Bhasin, Walji Raghvani, the Sarova Group, Empat Enterprises, Inc., M.R.N. & S., Inc., and M.D. Contractors (N.Y.) Corp. move to dismiss the complaint, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 9(b)…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Vicon Fiber Optics Corp. v. ScrivoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Brooke v. SchlesingerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Rosenheck v. RieberDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996